Recent Searches

Close

History

Close

Recent Pages

Recent Searches

EIU Office of Research and Sponsored Programs

IRB protocol Submission guide and tutorial

Click here to download the Application for IRB Review Form

 

This guide will provide expanded instructions and relevant examples for each prompt in the Application for IRB Review. Click on any of the following links to jump to guidance each section of the application:

Project Overview

Participants
Study Process and Procedures
Data Recording, Storage, and Security
Risks and Benefits

Informed Consent

Assent

Waiver of Documentation of Informed Consent or Assent

Protocol Submission Instructions

Supplemental Forms:
Waiver of Informed Consent or Assent
Public Use Data File
Sponsored Research

Section A:

PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Institutional Review Board IRB) will require basic information about project personnel as well as the project itself. 

Estimated Start Date:

Indicate when it is intended for research to begin (upon IRB approval). Research cannot begin until after the IRB has approved a protocol.

A project typically begins with a planning phase and preliminary research (e.g. a literature review). However, contact with human subjects cannot occur until the IRB has approved the research protocol. The Estimated Start Date is an estimate of when the portion of your project that involves human beings will begin.
For example:

A student begins planning a project in October by developing a topic, planning the research process with their faculty sponsor, and completing a literature review. The student submits a protocol in December, estimating that direct recruitment and the surveying of participants will begin in mid January. The estimated start date in this circumstance is January 15.

Estimated Completion Date:

This is your best estimate of when research would be completed and disseminated. 
 

Investigator(s):

Principal Investigator:

The Principal Investigator (PI) has primary responsibility for all aspects of the protection of human subjects on a given project, ensuring that the study is conducted in accordance with the ethical standards described in the Belmont Report, federal regulations, EIU policy, and the protocol as approved by the IRB.

If the Principal Investigator is a student:
  • Student researchers are required to have a faculty sponsor or an executive, administrative, or professional EAP) staff sponsor who serves as Co-Investigator.
  • The protocol must be compiled and written by the student PI, under the guidance of a faculty sponsor or EAP.
  • The primary responsibility of a Faculty Sponsor or EAP is to advise and support the PI in all aspects of the protection of human subjects on a given project.
Co-Investigator:
The Co-investigator is any other investigator, faculty sponsor, or executive, administrative, or professional EAP) staff sponsor involved with directing the research project. If there are any additional Co-Investigators, complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum: Additional Co-Investigators and include it with your protocol submission.
 
Investigator Information:
  • Status: Click in the textbox to select an option to indicate your status at EIU. If none of the available options apply, choose “other,” and explain your status when citing qualifications in the “Qualifications of Investigator” prompt below.
  • Email: Provide your EIU e-mail address. If you are not an EIU student or employee, please provide the e-mail address associated with the institution through which you are conducting your research.
  • Phone: Provide your preferred contact number.
  • Department or Unit: Provide the name of the department or unit through which you are conducting your research.

Prompt A.1: Qualifications of Investigator(s):

Briefly describe the qualifications of all investigators(s) conducting this research project. Include an overview of any relevant education and experience.
For example:

The Principal Investigator is a candidate for a Master of Science in Communication Disorders and Science degree at EIU. She has completed CITI Training and has 200 hours of supervised clinical experience with the targeted population. Dr. Jones has been conducting and guiding student research in this discipline for over 30 years.”

Prompt A.2: Project Description:

Describe the purpose of this research in layperson’s terms in 50 – 200 words. The description should be concise and written so that a person who is not trained in the research subject discipline would be able to understand it. Your response to this prompt should serve as a snapshot of your project and the research purpose, questions, and hypotheses should be apparent. Do not include rationale for conducting the research, citations, or literature reviews. 

For example:

This project will seek to discover whether gross motor movement during classroom time improves student focus. For a 6-week period, approximately 25 second grade students will engage in teacher-guided gross motor activity prior to the daily spelling lesson. Student spelling scores during this time will be compared to spelling scores prior to the study, as well as scores gathered for a 4-week period after the classroom gross motor activity ceases. The researcher hypothesizes that spelling scores will be improved during the 6-week period of gross motor activity.”

Prompt A.3: Academic Research:

If the project is being conducted to meet the requirements of a course or academic degree - whether at EIU or elsewhere, please indicate as such in this prompt. Do not include your thesis/dissertation proposal with your submission.
 

Prompt A.4: Sponsored Research:

If the project is being funded by an external source (such as a grant), please indicate as such in this prompt. Then, complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum for Sponsored Research and include it with your submission.
 

Prompt A.5: Project Dissemination:

Describe how the results of the research will be disseminated. Dissemination includes, but is not limited to the following: honors, master’s or doctoral theses; presentation at a scientific/professional meeting or conference; submission to or publication in a scientific/professional journal (paper or electronic); and internet postings.
 
Return to Top

Section B:

PARTICIPANTS

As part of the review process, the IRB will require information about the potential participants in the study, their characteristics, and what methods will be utilized to recruit them. 

Prompt B.1: Approximate number of human participants:

Indicate in this field how many participants you hope to recruit for your study.

Prompt B.2: Categories of Subjects and Controls:

Check all applicable categories of subjects and controls that will be included in the research. If your research participants are not members of any of the following populations, leave this prompt blank:

  • University/College Students: applicable when the targeted participant population includes college students.
  • Incarcerated Persons: any individual involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution. Prisoners receive additional protections under 45 CFR 46, Subpart C.
  • Students that you are teaching, supervising, or observing: applicable when potential participants are students at any educational level and are being taught, supervised, or observed by any investigator in the study (in an educational capacity separate from the research). 
  • Minors: applicable when potential participants are children aged 17 years or under. Age range of targeted population must be supplied when this box is checked. Minors have not yet attained the age of consent to treatments or procedures involved in research and receive additional protections under 45 CFR 46, Subpart D.
  • Decisionally Impaired Persons: applicable when potential participants’ ability to understand and provide informed consent is impaired due to a condition, illness, educational, and/or another disadvantage.
  • Institutionalized Decisionally Impaired Persons: applicable when potential participants’ ability to understand and provide informed consent is impaired due to a condition, illness, and/or other disadvantage, and that person is institutionalized.
  • Pregnant Persons: applicable when the targeted population is pregnant people
  • Persons with medical, psychological, or mental health conditions relevant to the research: applicable when potential participants are sought because they have been diagnosed with, or are receiving treatment for, an illness or condition is that is pertinent to the research, or they are being provided with diagnostic and/or medical care by any investigator in the study.
 

Prompt B.3: Characteristics:

Describe the characteristics/demographics of the population you will be studying. Characteristics can include, but are not limited to: age range, gender, ethnicity, health status, socioeconomic status. Provide inclusion and exclusion criteria. If participants include vulnerable persons, explain why their inclusion is necessary for the research. 

For example:

“Potential participants will be college students between the ages of 18 and 23 who are enrolled full-time at a mid-sized public university located in the Midwestern United States. Potential participants will comprise of all races, genders, religious beliefs, socioeconomic status and ethnicities. Participants must be U.S. citizens.”

If the study will include participants whose ability to give voluntary informed consent may be in question, explain the rationale for their inclusion. See 45 CFR 46, Subparts B, C, and D for guidance regarding special populations. Special populations include, but are not limited to:
  • Incarcerated persons
  • Minors
  • Decisionally-impaired persons
  • Populations that may be vulnerable to coercion, such as parolees, students of a researcher, or persons with a serious health condition.
For example:

"Potential participants will be residents of three privately-owned memory care facilities in the Midwestern United States. Potential participants can comprise of all races, genders, religious beliefs and ethnicities, but must range in age from 70 to 85, and must not present with any known comorbidities. This study seeks to research the dietary habits and nutritional intake of persons with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, and cannot be take place without participation from this population."

Prompt B.4: Recruitment:

Describe the process you will use to identify and recruit prospective subjects and include the agency(s) where prospective participants will be recruited from, when applicable. List any materials that will be utilized in marketing/recruitment and include those materials with your submission. Guidelines for the development of recruitment materials are included below.
Examples:

“Participants will be recruited via a post for a Facebook group for spouses of lupus patients. The post will provide information about the study, and a link to the on-line survey. If the required number of participants has not been met after two weeks a reminder will be posted. A copy of the wording of the initial recruitment and reminder posts are attached to this application.”

“Potential Participants are students in my classroom at Hawthorne School. A letter explaining the study will be sent to parents/guardians via their children. This letter will also serve as informed consent. There will be no direct recruitment, rather, parents will be given the option to opt their child out of the study. The letter is included with this application.”

Guidelines for Recruitment Materials:

Recruitment materials must contain identification of the institution(s) conducting the research. In addition, recruitment materials must include the following information:
  • Name of the researcher
  • A brief description of the research
  • Criteria for participation
  • A description of the procedures involved
  • A description of risk, benefit, and incentives (when applicable).

When recruitment materials are condensed (such as fliers or social media posts), briefer versions of the information can be supplied, and a direct link to (or instructions for accessing) more detailed information can be supplied.

Include a draft or final copy of all recruitment materials with your submission.
 

Prompt B.5: Incentives and Research Related Costs (if applicable):

Describe any incentives being offered to subjects for their participation in the research study. Incentives include, but are not limited to, monetary compensation, free or discounted services, course or assignment credit.
  • If monetary compensation is offered, specify the amount to be paid and the terms of payment. If other compensation is to be offered, describe the terms of the compensation in detail.
  • Explain how incentives will be affected if subjects withdraw before completion of the research.
If applicable, describe any cost(s) that the subjects would incur as a result of their participation in the research.
 

Prompt B.6: Health Care HIPAA:

Indicate whether or not the research involves any topic that will be subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA) by checking the appropriate box. Topics that are subject to HIPAA include, but are not limited to: 
  • Past, present, or future physical health of the participants - applicable when potential participants are sought because they are diagnosed with, are being treated for, or are perceived to be at risk of developing an illness or condition, and/or they are being provided with diagnostic care, treatment, or monitoring by any investigator in the study.
  • Mental health (as defined in DSM-V TR) - applicable when potential participants are sought due to their diagnosis of, or treatment for a mental illness or condition, and/or they are being provided with diagnostic and/or mental health care by any investigator in the study.
  • Provision of health care to the participants – applicable when subjects will receive health care treatment and/or diagnostics as part of the research.
  • Past, present, or future payments for the provision of health care to the participants – applicable when subjects will receive compensation for the cost of health care treatment and/or diagnostics as a result of participating in the research.

Refer to Appendix 4, HIPAA Information, in EIU Policy and Procedures for the Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.

Return to Top

Section C:

STUDY PROCESS AND PROCEDURES

When reviewing your protocol, the IRB will evaluate the research process, conditions, and procedures that participants will experience. Your response in this prompt should be written in a way that makes it clear to the reviewer what will occur, and what study participants will encounter and/or what tasks they will perform when participating. If you have more than one set of participants or more than one procedure, then procedures for each group or process must be detailed. 

The following information must be addressed in your response to this prompt:

Instruments: List all instruments, assessments, or other tools that will be used to collect the research data.
  • If applicable, attach a copy of all instruments to be administered to the subjects. Standard assessments or equipment (such as CARS2, oral swabs, or Wechsler Intelligence Scales), do not need to be attached.
  • If utilizing non-standard equipment, include a detailed description of the equipment and its source.

Data: Describe the data/research material that will be obtained from subjects and how it will be collected. Indicate whether the data will be obtained specifically for the research. 

Routine Procedures: Indicate whether any procedures are not routine and will be performed specifically for this research project.

Timeframe: Indicate the timeframe for data collection. If there are intervals between data collections, define the time between collection periods. Estimate the total amount of time a subject would spend participating in the research.

Location and Setting: Explain where participants and the researcher will be physically located during the study. Provide the name of the site or agency along with pertinent identifying information. Describe the setting and mode of administration, including whether processes will be administered individually or in group settings. Include any other relevant conditions (such as time of day, privacy, climate conditions, etc.). If research will be conducted online, indicate the platform to be utilized, the agency(s) where participants will be recruited from (if applicable), and the physical location of the participant and investigator, when possible.

If a facility being utilized as a location is not owned and operated by EIU (including direct recruitment from an agency where data is collected electronically), a letter from an appropriate administrator of the facility must be submitted with this application. If facility administrator will not provide a letter until IRB approval is obtained, state this in the prompt. See below for more information regarding research at locations not owned and operated by EIU.

Examples for this prompt:

"Participants will be asked to complete an online survey regarding their views of tobacco use (see Appendix B). Quantitative data will be analyzed to determine attitudes and trends toward tobacco use by age group. Data will be collected using Qualtrics online survey software.Likert scales will be utilized and all data will be numeric. Surveys will be taken online at a location of the participant’s choosing. Surveys can be accessed via PC, smartphone, or tablet. Surveys will take up to 20 minutes per individual to complete. The survey will be online for data collection for 6 weeks."

"Data collection will take place in my classroom at Alan Shepard High School in Tinley Park, Illinois. For a period of six weeks student participants will submit journal entries online after completing each history assignment. Participants will be provided a prompt for each journal entry (see Appendix A). Each student will utilize their district-provided laptops and will submit the journal entry through Canvas. Journal entries will take roughly 5 to 10 minutes to complete, and there will be time in class at the end of the history period for students to complete their entries. While the history work is part of the standard curriculum, journal entries will be completed solely for this study. Journal entries will be analyzed by the PI and faculty sponsor to look for trends in participant responses."

"Interviews will be conducted over Zoom, with the PI being in her private office, and the participant being at a place of their choosing. The participant will be advised to select a location that affords privacy. Interviews will be audio recorded and are expected to last up to 30 minutes. Participants may also receive a phone call if the PI needs to clarify any responses when transcribing. Qualitative data will then be evaluated and categorized by the PI."

"Collection will take place at Lab B of Memorial Hospital, Springfield, Illinois. Saliva samples will be collected from participants in order to test for presence of COVID-19 to determine the number of asymptomatic cases. Clinicians will use SalivaBio Oral Swab (SOS) collection devices to collect about 0.5cc of saliva from participants. Saliva samples will be analyzed to detect viral presence using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA). Participants will be swabbed on an appointment basis at a time of their choosing. Samples will take about 30 seconds to collect. Participants can expect to spend 15 minutes at the BIO Lab to provide informed consent and the sample. Participants will provide two samples, three months apart, for a total of 30 minutes of participation."

Guidelines for research at locations not owned and operated by EIU:

When a facility being utilized is not owned and operated by Eastern Illinois University, a letter from an appropriate administrator of the facility must be submitted with the protocol. The letter must be on the facility’s letterhead stationery or e-mail, and should contain the following:
  • Agreement for the study to be conducted at the site
  • Identification of someone at the site who will provide information about appropriateness of the study for its population
  • Assurance of adequate capabilities to perform the research as approved by the IRB; and if applicable
  • Assurance that facility personnel involved in data collection have appropriate expertise and will follow IRB approved procedures.

Exceptions

Exempt research: a letter from the administrator is not required unless potential participants are children.

If a study will receive federal funding, an administrator letter is not required because Federal Wide Assurance must be provided (see below*).

If the study is online, an administrator letter is only required in any of the following circumstances:
    • Participants will be recruited through the agency
    • Participants will be utilizing facility-owned equipment
    • The agency will be involved in the provision of research (such as distributing a survey) 
If administrator letters are not available at the time of IRB review, IRB approval will be contingent upon receipt of the letters. Indicate in the prompt that the letter is being sought and will be submitted once it is received. The IRB can review the protocol in the interim, and approval can be granted once the letter is received and reviewed by the IRB. Research cannot begin until the IRB approves the protocol after the letter is received.
 
*If the research project will receive federal funds and is being conducted at a facility that is not owned and operated by EIU, the facility must have a Federal Wide Assurance FWA) with the Office for Human Research Protections OHRP), and the FWA number must be provided in the Application for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects. See Sponsored Research instructions for more detail.

 

Return to Top

Section D:

DATA RECORDING, STORAGE, AND SECURITY

The collection, handling, and secure storage of data is critical to the safety and welfare of human participants in research. The IRB will require precise information in the following prompts regarding the collection, handling, and storage of data. 

Prompt D.1: Data Recording and Storage:

Electronic data shall be password-protected at the workstation or file level. If this level of protection is not feasible, electronic data should be stored on removable media in a secure (locked) area. Confidential hard copy information gathered from or about any research subject must be stored in a secure (locked) facility to which only the PI and authorized project staff have access.

The following information must be addressed in your response to this prompt:

Tools and Software: Describe what specifically will be used to record and store data/specimens through the duration of the research. You must account for all data and any identifiers collected.

Data Security: Describe in detail how data will be kept secure through the duration of the study and who will have access to it.

Data Transfer: If data will be transferred from initial collection source to another form of storage, indicate specific steps and methods. 

For example:

"Participant responses will be stored within the Survey Monkey software throughout the duration of the collection period. Survey Monkey has a secure data storage method within the program. A password is required to access it. Only the PI and Faculty Sponsor have the password. When the collection period has ended, data will be downloaded to the PI's password-protected PC and imported into Excel. The PI will be the only person to have access to the raw data."

"Once the saliva sample is collected, the swab will immediately be placed in a polypropylene tube and sealed. Tubes will be placed in a tray, and the tray will be placed in a locked cold-storage compartment until analysis occurs. Only the PI and co-investigators have keys to the cold storage compartment. Results, along with participant age, gender, and geographic region will be recorded in MS Access. The Access database will be stored on a password-protected PC in the Biosciences lab. Only the PI and Director will have access to the data."

"Student worksheets will be stored in a locked file cabinet in the teacher researcher’s classroom. The teacher, school principal, and thesis adviser will have access to the worksheets. Analysis of progress will be recorded in a spreadsheet on the teacher’s password protected laptop PC. Only the teacher researcher and thesis adviser will have access to the spreadsheets."

Prompt D.2: Participant Confidentiality:

State whether data will be recorded with or without names or other identifying information. Explain specific steps that will be taken to ensure confidentiality, when applicable. If applicable, indicate how any identifiers (such as indexes containing code or alias assignments) will be stored. Indicate who will have access to any items that identify subjects. Be sure to include the processes by which this information will be kept separate from the research data.

For example:

"All responses will be anonymous. None of the questions in the survey could lead to the collection of data that could identify the respondent. All responses are recorded as a number and no names or e-mail addresses will be collected. Participants who wish to enter the drawing for an Amazon gift card will be directed to a separate survey to provide their e-mail address. This info will not be connected to the survey data in any way and will also be password-protected. E-mail addresses will be downloaded to the PI's password-protected pc to conduct the drawing, then the database containing e-mail addresses will be immediately deleted."

"Samples will be labeled with a random number that is assigned to each participant. There will be no identifying information in the data. A spreadsheet tracking participant number assignments will be stored electronically on a PC in the director’s office, and is not the same PC that is housing the research data."

"Students will be asked not to put their name on their worksheets. However, if a student does sign their name on the worksheet, that portion of the worksheet will be cut off and shredded."

Note: Signed consent forms must also be stored in a location separate from data. 
 

Prompt D.3: AV Recording:

If audio or video recording is being utilized, please explain why it is necessary for the study.
For example:

"Interviews will be recorded using the recording tool in Zoom. This is necessary for accurate transcription of participants' responses and to ensure the proper context of participant responses are understood by reviewing their accompanying non-verbal queues and vocal inflections."

Prompt D.4: Participant Withdrawal:

Describe how collected data from subjects who formally withdraw from the study will be handled and whether or not the data will be utilized in the study’s results. 
For example:

"Data will not be collected if a participant closes the survey prior to completion."

"If a participant wishes to withdraw, the spreadsheet containing code assignments will be accessed in order to identify the specimen. The specimen will be removed from storage, the label will be removed, and the vial will be placed in the biohazard waste container. The participant’s code assignment will then be removed from the spreadsheet."

"There will be no way to identify student worksheets once they have been submitted. However, students who withdraw will not submit worksheets as the study continues."

Prompt D.5: Post-Study Data Storage:

Records (e.g., signed informed consent forms, data) relating to the research project must be retained for at least three years after completion of the research.  All records must be accessible for inspection and copying by authorized representatives of the department or agency supporting or conducting the research at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner [45 CFR 46.115(b)].

In this prompt, describe how all records relating to the project will be securely stored when the research is completed. You must account for all data or identifiers in this prompt. Then, explain how materials will be destroyed once the mandated storage period has passed.
For example:

"The excel spreadsheet containing the data will be stored on a secure password-protected Microsoft One drive. After three years the spreadsheet will be deleted."

"Student worksheets will be stored in a locked file cabinet in the teacher’s classroom. The data spreadsheet will be moved to the PI’s password protected drive on the district’s network. After 3 years the worksheets will be shredded and the spreadsheet will be deleted."

"Saliva samples will be placed in a locked cold-storage box in the Biosciences lab. Analytical data will be stored on a password-protected PC in the Biosciences lab. Signed consent forms will be stored in a locked file cabinet in the director’s office. The spreadsheet containing identifiers will stored on a password-protected PC in the director’s office. After three years the saliva samples will be discarded in the biohazard waste receptacle in the Biosciences lab. Signed consent forms will be shredded. The spreadsheet containing identifiers will be deleted from the director’s PC. The Access database will remain active for a period of ten years as the study has the potential to expand."

Prompt D.6: Public Use Data File:

If you will be creating a data file for public use, see Public Use Data File Instructions
 
Return to Top

Section E:

RISKS AND BENEFITS

As part of the review process, the IRB will evaluate the level of risk to human participants in a study and will determine whether the risks outweigh the benefits of the study. Risk and benefit information will need to be provided in clear detail in the Application for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.

Prompt E.1: Category of Risk:

Indicate the category of risk to participants that most accurately describes the research by checking the appropriate box on the form:

Not greater than minimal risk: The probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. Minimal risk could include (but are not limited to): feeling uncomfortable talking to a new person, mild anxiety, being afraid of not knowing a response, becoming frustrated with a study's process, or even loss of time out of a busy day.
An example of research that is of minimal risk:
University Students are invited to take an online survey regarding their experiences navigating campus during the first week of class.
Greater than minimal risk, but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects: The probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research is slightly greater in than those ordinarily encountered in daily life, but direct benefit to the participant is anticipated.
For example:
Persons over 50 years of age are invited to participate in a light exercise program that emphasizes physical fitness. Participant weight,BMI, and heart rate are tracked throughout the study to measure success. There is an elevated risk as participants engage in exercise, but the program should provide an overall benefit to each participant as their fitness improves.
Greater than minimal risk, no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjects’ situation, disorder, or condition: The probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research is slightly greater in than those ordinarily encountered in daily life and no direct benefit to the participant is anticipated. However, knowledge about the topic will be of benefit to society, and/or indirect benefit to the participant is anticipated.
For example:
Persons who have experienced a trauma in the past are asked to discuss their traumatic event and their subsequent coping mechanisms in order to determine the most commonly utilized coping mechanisms, whether or not they were considered to be successful, and what barriers existed when accessing post-trauma care. There is an elevated risk as participants discuss traumatic events in their lives, and participants will derive no benefit from discussing those events. However, society will benefit by the discovery of trauma coping mechanisms and the information can help toward reduction of barriers. Participants may also benefit from what is learned in the study.
Higher in potential risk to participants, but has the potential to directly benefit participants, or to impactfully benefit society at large: Study is considered to be high-risk or involves unusual types of risk to subjects, and/or potential subjects are members of a vulnerable population. However, it is anticipated that the research will elicit knowledge about the topic that will be of benefit to society, and/or of direct benefit to the participant.
For example:
A common medication that has been utilized by adults for cholesterol management is found to help adults with hypersensitivities to sound. A drug trial will be conducted to determine if the medication can be effective in treating children with these same hypersensitivities. Several of the minor participants are on the autism spectrum.

Prompt E.2: Identification of Risk(s):

Every study comes with some risk. It is important for investigators to convey that they have carefully considered any potential risk their subjects may encounter, no matter how small that risk may appear to be. Describe specific short-term and/or long-term potential risk(s) to subjects, including confidentiality. Risks can be - but are not limited to - physical, psychological, social, or legal. Assess and describe the likelihood and seriousness of each risk identified. 

Example:

"Participants may feel uncomfortable or frustrated when trying the various pencil grips.”

"Some survey items ask participants to recall experiences that may have been unpleasant or in rare cases, traumatizing."

Prompt E.3: Marginalized Populations:

In this prompt, you will need to describe what processes are in place to ensure all aspects of the study do not potentially harm members of a marginalized community.  

Protecting marginalized people from harm in research does not mean that all people must be included in a study, or that a study’s focus must be about all people. What it means is that, when a human being meets the criteria for participation in a study, they are not to be harmed by the study's language or processes.

For example:

All students who live on campus at a Midwestern college are invited to participate in an online survey. The invitation states that the study is about students' eating habits throughout finals week. Once students consent to participate and click on the link to the survey, they find that the survey focuses primarily on the consumption of bacon in student dining areas during this time period.

The study is potentially harmful to participants who are unable to consume bacon/pork for religious reasons (or due to a health condition). The feelings of exclusion students may already be experiencing are compounded when they are invited to participate in a study only to find that their religion has been disregarded. The invitation implies that all students are able to eat bacon and fails to recognize their religious practice.  

If the researchers truly wish to specifically examine the consumption of pork in student dining areas, then the purpose of the study needs to be made clear when inviting students to participate, and/or the participation criteria needs to be narrowed. The following examples of invitation language would be clearer and therefore, more inclusive:

“The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of the consumption of bacon during stressful times in the student experience.”

“Students who live on campus and who consume pork and bacon products are invited to participate in the research.”

In these examples above, students who cannot eat pork are alerted to the fact that the study may not be one they wish to participate in, and more importantly, the invitation respectfully acknowledges that there are people who cannot eat pork.
 

If, in this scenario, researchers seek to understand students' reasons for eating/not eating bacon during finals week - including for religious reasons - then the invitation can remain broad, but considerations would need to be made in the survey itself.

For example:

All students are invited to participate in the online survey. A question in the survey asks if participants eat bacon in the dining halls.Respondents who answer "no" would be directed to a question that seeks to know why they do not eat dining hall bacon. 

In this example, students inability to eat bacon is acknowledged, and their situation and opinions are taken into consideration.
 
Using the dining hall bacon consumption scenario, some examples of appropriate responses to this prompt in the Application for IRB Review would be: 

“Because there are religious practices that forbid the consumption of pork products, the invitation is worded so that potential participants understand the nature of the study.”

"Participants will be asked if they consume bacon in the dining halls; those who do not will be invited to provide reasons why they do not eat bacon in the dining halls."

Other examples of the protection of marginalized populations and their respective responses to this prompt:

“Gender inclusive language is included in all communication with potential participants. Because this study seeks to understand exercise habits during menstruation cycles, the recruitment flier requests participants who have experienced menstruation.”

 “As this study will seek to understand the experiences of students who live with autism on a college campus, all survey items were reviewed by a licensed counselor on campus who specializes in autism spectrum counseling. In addition, participants will be provided with the contact information for this counselor.”

“Translation services will be available for all participants.”

Differing abilities or needs:

Differing abilities refers to the diverse range of abilities human participants may have.

Differing needs refers to barriers that may affect a person’s ability to participate in a study. Barriers can be (but are not limited to) socioeconomic, educational, or linguistic factors.

When applicable, describe in this prompt accommodation(s) that will be in place for participants with differing abilities or needs.
Prompt examples describing accommodation for differing ability:

“The researcher will be aware of and will provide accommodations as specified in student participants’ individualized education plan IEP) during the assessment period.” 

“The laboratory where collection will occur is fully accessible: the lab entrance is labeled in large print and braille and there are no stairs at the entrance. An outdoor collection tent will be available for participants who do not feel comfortable in the laboratory.”

Prompt examples describing accommodation for differing need:

 “Translations of the survey and informed consent will be available to participants who need it.”

“Potential interviewees who do not have internet access will be provided with a private space at the University library in order to participate in a discussion over Zoom.”

Prompt E.4: Safety Precautions:

Describe the processes and procedures that will be in place to protect subjects from, or minimize the potential risk(s) that had been identified.
  • Where appropriate, discuss provisions for ensuring necessary medical or professional intervention in the event of adverse effects to the subject(s) and attach a referral list.
  • When applicable, describe alternative treatments or procedures that might be advantageous to the subjects.
  • Where appropriate, describe the provisions and procedures for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.
For Example:

"Students will be reminded that they do not have to try the new pencil grips if they don't want to, and can stop using them at any time and no one will be upset with them."

"Informed consent will clearly state that there are items in the survey that ask participants to recall experiences where they may have witnessed a crime. Information for Counseling Services is provided in the informed consent letter and in a debrief form that will be provided at the end of the survey. Participants are advised that they can skip questions and/or discontinue their participation at any time with no penalty to them." 

Prompt E.5: Benefits:

Describe the potential direct benefits subjects may receive as a result of participating in this research (this does not include incentives for participation). Describe the potential benefits to society that may be expected from this research.

For Example:

"Some participants may benefit from learning about new pencil grips and which ones might be right for them. Results from this project will inform other educators about the efficacy of the new pencil grips."

Prompt F.5: Benefits vs. Risks:

Discuss why the risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to any anticipated direct benefits to subjects and in relation to the importance of knowledge that may reasonably be expected as a result of the study. TheIRBB will evaluate the level of risk to human participants in a study, and whether the risks outweigh the benefits of the study as part of the review process.

For Example:

"While beginning a light exercise program does come with some risk, participants will most likely see an improvement in their strength, balance, and coordination. If this is the case, further study could reveal that this specific exercise program could be of benefit to seniors."

Return to Top

Section F:

INFORMED CONSENT

Complete this section of the application if your research involves participants who are adults.

“Informed consent is one of the primary ethical requirements underpinning research with human subjects; it reflects the basic principle of respect for persons. Informed consent assures that prospective human subjects will understand the nature of the research and can knowledgeably and voluntarily decide whether to participate” IRB Guidebook).

Informed consent is mandated by Federal regulations (45 CFR 46) and EIU Policy and Procedures for the Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.
 

Informed consent is the two-part process of

1. Providing potential participants with required key information about the research and their rights as participants

2. Obtaining their agreement to participate.

For further guidance and informed consent phrasing assistance, see the Informed Consent Template and Informed Consent Checklist at the EIU IRB Forms website.

 

Completing the Informed Consent section of the Application (Section F):

The IRB will need to review your plan for providing informed consent information (along with the informed consent information that will be provided to potential participants), and your plan for obtaining subjects' consent to participate.

Prompt F.1: Providing Informed Consent Information

Describe how informed consent information will be provided to potential participants. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:

"Potential participants will be presented with a letter of informed consent upon arrival. The researchers will discuss the letter with the each potential participant and will answer any questions they may have."

"Potential participants for the online survey portion of the study will be presented with informed consent information in the e-mail that invites them to participate. Participants who will participate in interviews will be given a letter of informed consent when they arrive. The researcher will go over any questions they may have."

If you are seeking approval to not provide some or all informed consent information to potential participants, complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum Waiver of Informed Consent or Assent and include it with your submission.
 

Prompt F.2: Consent to Participate:

Describe how participants will indicate their consent to participate and how it will be recorded, when applicable. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:

"Participants will sign and date the form. The researcher will provide the participant with a copy of the signed form and will retain the original for their records."

"After reading the informed consent information in the invitation e-mail, the participant will click the link to the survey, which indicates consent to participate."

Prompt F.3: Secure Storage of Informed Consent Forms:

Describe, in detail, how signed consent forms will be securely stored. Signed forms must be kept separate from any collected data, and your response to this prompt must specify how this will be accomplished.

NoteIf you will not be collecting signed consent forms, you must provide a response in Prompt F.4.

For example:

"Signed forms will be locked in a file cabinet in a locked office that only the principal investigator has access to. This file cabinet is in a different location from the data storage unit."

Prompt F.4: Waiver of Documentation of Informed Consent:

In certain circumstances, the IRB can approve a waiver of documentation of informed consent, meaning, informed consent information is provided to potential participants, but signatures of consent are not collected. 

Online surveys in which participants check a box to indicate their consent before beginning the survey require a waiver of documentation of informed consent because their consent is not being documented.

This prompt provides the circumstances allowed to obtain this waiver. Check the box next to the circumstance that most accurately describes your research. Complete this prompt only if you are providing informed consent information to your potential participants, but are not collecting signatures.

Note: It should be apparent throughout your application - particularly in Section E (Risk) why the criterion you select would be met. 
 

Prompt F.5: Multiple Data Collection Periods:

If your research involves more than one period of data collection (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), indicate which process you are requesting the waiver for.
For example:
"The waiver is being requested for the online survey portion of the study only; signatures will be collected from participants prior to the in-person interview portion."
"The waiver is being requested for all phases of the study."

Include full text of the informed consent document with your application.

 

Return to Top
 

Section G:

ASSENT

Complete this section if your research involves participants who are minors or who are adults with decisional impairment.

When minors (children ages 0 through 17) and/or persons with decision impairment are the subjects of research, there is a four-part process to obtaining their permission to participate:
First, you must obtain informed consent from the parent, guardian, or legally authorized representative of potential participants:
1. Provide parents/guardians with key information about the research and their child or ward's rights as participants, using established informed consent guidelines.

2. Obtain parent/guardian agreement to allow their child or ward to participate in the research. If a parent/guardian does not give consent, you cannot seek a subject's assent under any circumstances.

Once informed consent is obtained from the parent or guardian, only then can you seek to obtain assent from the potential participant:
1. Provide developmentally appropriate information about the research and participants' rights to the potential participants.

2. Obtain their permission (assent) to participate as subjects in the research. 

Note: A parent or guardian may provide consent for their child or ward to participant, however, the child or ward still has the right to decline to participate. 

For assent guidance and phrasing assistance, see “Assent Guidelines” and the Informed Consent Templates and Checklist at the EIU IRB Forms website.

 

Completing the Assent section of the Application (Section G):

The IRB will need to review your plan for providing obtaining informed consent from parents/guardians, and assent from potential participants. Informed consent and assent information that will be provided to parents, guardians, and potential participants must also be reviewed. If assent is to be delivered verbally, the IRB will need to review the script of what will be stated.

This section of the Application contains two areas: one for parent/guardian informed consent, and one for participant assent.

Parent/Guardian Informed Consent:

Prompt G.1: Providing Informed Consent Information to Parent/Guardian

Describe how informed consent information will be provided to the parent or guardian of potential participants. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:

"Parents or guardians of potential participants will be presented with a letter of informed consent upon arrival. The researchers will discuss the letter with the each potential participant and will answer any questions they may have."

"A letter of informed consent will be sent home to parents one week prior to the beginning of the collection of data in the classroom. For the interview portion of the study, parents of potential participants will be presented with informed consent information upon arrival."

If you are seeking approval to not provide some or all informed consent information to parents or guardians of potential participants, complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum Waiver of Informed Consent or Assent and include it with your submission.

 

Prompt G.2: Parent/Guardian Consent for Participation:

Describe how parents/guardians will indicate their consent for their child or ward to participate in the research and how that consent will be recorded. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:
"Parents or guardians of potential participants will sign and date the form. The researcher will provide the parent/guardian with a copy of the signed form and will retain the original for their records."
"Parents will be asked to contact the teacher researcher if they wish to opt their child out of the study. Otherwise, consent is implied." 

Prompt G.3: Secure Storage of Informed Consent Forms:

Describe, in detail, how signed consent forms will be securely stored. Signed forms must be kept separate from any collected data, and your response to this prompt must specify how this will be accomplished.

NoteIf you will not be collecting signed consent forms, you must provide a response in Prompt G.4.

For example:

"Signed forms will be locked in a file cabinet in a locked office that only the principal investigator has access to."

Prompt G.4: Waiver of Documentation of Parent/Guardian Informed Consent:

In certain circumstances, the IRB can approve a waiver of documentation of parent/guardian informed consent, meaning, informed consent information is provided to parents/guardians of potential participants, but signatures of consent are not collected. This prompt provides the criteria for this waiver. Check the box next to the circumstance that most accurately describes your research. Complete this prompt only if you are providing informed consent information to the parents/guardians of potential participants, but are not collecting signatures.

Note: It should be apparent throughout your application - particularity in Section E (Risk) why the selected criterion would be met. 

 

Prompt G.5: Multiple Data Collection Periods:

If your research involves more than one period of data collection (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), indicate which process you are requesting the waiver for.

For example:
"The waiver is being requested for the classroom data collection portion of the study only; signatures will be collected from parents of potential participants prior to the in-person interview portion."

Minor or Adult with Decisional Impairment Assent to Participate: 

Prompt G.6: Providing Assent Information to Potential Participant

Describe how assent information will be provided to potential participants. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:

"Potential participants will be presented with a letter containing assent information when they arrive. The researchers will discuss the letter with the each potential participant and will answer any questions they may have."

"The researcher will read an assent script to all potential participants the morning that data collection will begin. Students who do not wish to participate will be instructed to inform the researcher when the class is preparing for the lunch break."

If you are seeking approval to not provide some or all assent information to potential participants, complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum Waiver of Informed Consent or Assent and include it with your submission.

Note: it is sometimes necessary to simplify assent information so that it is developmentally appropriate for the targeted population. These adjustments do not require a waiver of assent as long as the information is being provided in a developmentally-appropriate way. 

 

Prompt G.7: Participant Assent:

Describe how participants will indicate their assent to participate in the research and how that assent will be recorded in a way that is developmentally appropriate for the participant. If your study has more than one data collection period (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), provide a description for each process.

For Example:

"Participants will sign and date the form. The researcher will provide the participant with a copy of the signed form and will retain the original for their records."
"The potential participant will be asked verbally if they would like to stack blocks with the researcher. If they agree to, the researcher will ask if it's ok to film them playing so that she and her teacher can look at it later to learn things about the way kids play with blocks. If the child agrees, recording will begin. The researcher will ask the subject, 'say yes if you agreed to play blocks with me and for us to record it so that me and my teacher can watch later.' Once the child affirms, the session will begin. If the child disagrees, recording will stop and the session will end."

Prompt G.8: Secure Storage of Assent Forms:

Describe, in detail, how signed assent forms or recordings of assent (when developmentally appropriate) will be securely stored. If you will not be collecting signed forms or recordings, you must provide a response in Prompt G.9.

Note: Signed forms and recordings must be kept separate from any collected data, and your response to this prompt must specify how this will be accomplished.

For example:

"Signed forms will be locked in a file cabinet in a locked office that only the principal investigator has access to."

"Recordings of assent are included as part of the session; however, the participant's name will not be used in the recorded assent process or the session. Transcription and any identifying information will be stored on a separate password protected pc."

Prompt G.9: Waiver of Documentation of Assent:

In certain circumstances, the IRB can approve a waiver of documentation of assent, meaning, assent information is provided to potential participants, however, developmentally appropriate recording of assent is not collected. Appropriate methods for documenting assent can include the following, as long as they are developmentally appropriate:
  • collecting signed documents from participants
  • recording assent audio/visually
  • having a witness document verbal assent 

This prompt provides the criteria for this waiver. Check the box next to the circumstance that most accurately describes your research. Complete this prompt only if you are providing assent information to potential participants, but are not recording assent.

Note: It should be apparent throughout your application - particularity in Section E (Risk) why the selected criterion would be met. 

 

Prompt G.10: Multiple Data Collection Periods:

If your research involves more than one period of data collection involving participants who are minors or adults who are decisionally-impaired (e.g., collection of data in a classroom and then in-person interviews), indicate which process you are requesting the waiver for.

For example:
"The waiver is being requested for the classroom data collection portion of the study only; signatures will be collected potential participants prior to the in-person interview portion."
 

Include full text of the informed consent and assent documents (or assent script if delivered verbally) with the application.

Return to Top

PROTOCOL SUBMISSION

Submit all supplemental materials with the completed application. Supplemental materials can include, but are not limited to:
  • Informed Consent document
  • If applicable, Assent document or script
  • Questionnaires, surveys, tests, or other materials that will be administered to subjects.
  • If applicable, any recruitment materials (including e-mails, advertisements, fliers, and/or text of social media posts)
  • If applicable, written permission from other institutions or agencies involved in the research (e.g., school board, hospital, agency, prison).
 

Investigator Assurance:

The Primary Investigator must read all assurance items and check each corresponding box prior to signing the application:

  • Certify that the information provided on the application for your project is accurate and compiled by you.

  • Agree to conduct the research as described in the application and the attached supporting documents, and that no other procedures will be used in this research.

  • Verify that you will request approval from the IRB for changes to the study’s protocol and/or consent forms and will not implement the changes until IRB approval for any changes is received.

  • Agree to comply with IRB policy for the conduct of ethical research and will promptly report significant or adverse effects to the IRB chairperson or vice chairperson. In addition you agree to submit a Report of Adverse Effects or Noncompliance to the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs within 5 days of occurrence.
    • Adverse events can include, but are not limited to: physical or psychological harm, or a change in risk to, or breach in confidentiality. Adverse effects may be directly or indirectly related to the research and may be expected or unexpected. The IRB should always be informed of any problems or accidents in a study. You are encouraged to contact the IRB chairperson or IRB vice chairperson if anything occurs that causes concern regarding the protection of human subjects. See Section H of the IRB Policy Document for more information regarding risk, adverse effects, and noncompliance.

  • Confirm that you understand that you are responsible for ensuring that the work of others involved with this project complies with this protocol and IRB policy.
    • Certify that you have completed CITI training within 3 years prior to this project’s estimated start date.
    • If CITI training was completed under a different name, please provide that name in the space below.
    • If CITI training was completed for another institution, you must add EIU as an affiliation at the CITI website and verify that the training fulfills EIU’s CITI training requirement by viewing the courses in your institutional course listing for EIU.

  • Assure that any co-investigators involved in the project (other than faculty/EAP sponsors) are knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human subjects, and that you will monitor study progress and compliance with IRB policy for the conduct of ethical research. 

The form can then be signed either by pen or electronically.

 

Faculty or EAP Staff Sponsor Assurance

Faculty or EAP Sponsor assurance is required when Primary Investigator is a student. The Sponsor must read all assurance items and check each corresponding box prior to signing the application:

  • The sponsor must certify that they have reviewed the research protocol and can attest to the scientific merit of the study and the competency of the investigator(s) to conduct the project.

  • The sponsor must assure that the investigator(s) is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human subjects.

  • The sponsor must agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progress and compliance with IRB policy for the conduct of ethical research.

  • The sponsor must agree to promptly report any significant or adverse effects or noncompliance to the IRB chairperson or vice chairperson immediately upon becoming aware of them.
    • Adverse events can include, but are not limited to: physical or psychological harm, or a change in risk to, or breach in confidentiality. Adverse effects may be directly or indirectly related to the research and may be expected or unexpected.
    • Noncompliance includes, but is not limited to: misuse or non-use of approved consent procedures, breaking confidentiality (unless required by law) or failing to properly secure confidential records, unapproved subject recruitment, abuse of subjects, conducting research that has not been approved by the IRB, deviating from the approved research protocol in any way.
    • The IRB should always be informed of any problems or accidents in a study. You are encouraged to contact the IRB chairperson or IRB vice chairperson if anything occurs that causes concern regarding the protection of human subjects. See Section H of the IRB Policy Document for more information regarding risk, adverse effects, and noncompliance.
 
  • The sponsor must certify that they have completed CITI training within 3 years prior to the project’s estimated start date.

  • The sponsor must assure that they understand the responsibilities and what is required of them when sponsoring student research. 

 

Protocol Submission:

Signed protocols can be e-mailed as attachments to the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at eiuirb@eiu.edu. When the Principal Investigator is a student researcher, the faculty or EAP sponsor must be copied (cc) in the submission e-mail.

While e-mail submission is preferred, paper copies will also be accepted. Deliver unstapled paper copies to the Office of Research & Sponsored Programs, 1102 Blair Hall. 

Do not submit forms via links to personal or shared drives (such as Outlook or Google docs).

 

Timeline for Review:

Protocols will be screened by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs to verify all required information is included before a protocol is reviewed by the IRB. Screening will be conducted within ten business days of protocol submission. Protocols are screened in the order they are received, regardless of estimated project start date. The Principal Investigator (and Faculty Sponsor, when applicable) will receive notification via e-mail regarding their project’s status within this ten-day timeframe.

Additional information and/or a modification to the protocol may be requested. These requests will be sent via e-mail. Investigators will have the opportunity to respond to concerns, ask questions, update and resubmit their application, which will be reviewed within 10 business days of receipt of the resubmission.

Return to Top

PUBLIC USE DATA FILES

When Utilizing a Public Use Data File:

Many private organizations and public agencies make individual level data available to the public. If data files have been reviewed by the appropriate IRB and have been classified as public use data files, then it is not necessary to obtain EIU IRB review and approval to use public use data files in your research.

When utilizing public use data files, be aware of the following:
  • Not all publicly available data has been classified as public use data. It must be indicated on the documentation supplied with the file that the data has been reviewed by the appropriate IRB before it was made available to the public.
  • IRB approval is required when obtaining individually identifiable data (from the sponsor of the public use data file or any other source) and merging with a public use data file.

 

When Creating a Public Use Data File:

Many funding agencies require or recommend that projects produce public use data files for future use. If a public use data file will be created, you must indicate this in the Application for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.

The funding agency may provide guidance in creation of public use files. Provide this information to the IRB when submitting the protocol to prepare a public use data file.

If you did not initially plan to develop a public use data file, but it is determined later that you wish to develop one, you must submit a modification request to the IRB.

Once the project is completed, submit the proposed public use data file to the IRB for inspection.

For the IRB to classify the file as a public use data file, one of the two following situations must apply:
  • The data were anonymous when originally collected or data were collected from unknown persons.
  • The data were collected from identified persons, but the file has been stripped of individual identifiers and any other information that may risk disclosure of any subject’s identity. The following elements must be considered in determining whether the risk of disclosure of subjects’ identity is properly addressed:
    • All individual identifiers of each human research subject or any person named by any human research subject must be removed
    • All variables that can be surrogates for individual identifiers (e.g., street address of subject) must be removed.
    • To remove the possibility of identification when a human research subject is in a small subgroup within the sample, it may be necessary to collapse or combine categories of a variable. For example, detailed breakdowns of religious denomination in a survey question or medical diagnosis/procedure codes may need to be collapsed into fewer categories.
    • Delete or mask, as described above, any variable that a secondary user may employ to identify any research subject. For example, the PI may need to assign a new subject ID to each individual if the original subject ID contained identifying information, such as letters from the last name or part of the date of birth.
    • Use statistical methods to add random variation to variables that cannot otherwise be masked. For example, a data file may contain a combination of public and private information on a relatively small sample, perhaps demographic characteristics and salary of a public official, along with attitudinal information. The income variable may need to be altered so that it cannot be combined with the demographic characteristics to enable identifying the individual and thereby risking disclosure of private information. This option should be used only if other techniques do not work, because it may compromise the integrity of the data.
Return to Top

Application Addendums:

WAIVER OF INFORMED CONSENT AND/OR ASSENT

Complete application addendum only if:

  • You are requesting to not provide any or all required elements of informed consent in writing to potential adult participants, or
  • You are requesting to not provide any or all required elements of informed consent in writing to parents/guardians or potential participants who are minors or who are decisionally impaired, or
  • You are requesting to not provide any or all required elements of assent in a developmentally appropriate way to potential participants who are minors or who are decisionally impaired.
    • Note: it is sometimes necessary to simplify assent information so that it is developmentally appropriate for the targeted population. This addendum form is not required as long as the information is being provided in a developmentally-appropriate way. 
 
In limited circumstances, the IRB can approve a waiver of some or all of the informed consent or assent processes, meaning, participants would not be provided with all required information prior to participating in the research. This is known as a waiver of informed consent/assent.
  • In circumstances where providing all required elements of assent to minor subjects would be inappropriate for their comprehension level, a waiver of this nature does not need to be requested. 
Provide detailed responses to each of the items in this application addendum. As waivers of this nature are only provided in limited circumstances, it is important that responses in this prompt are clear and thorough.
 

First, indicate the circumstances of the waiver request.

 

Prompt 1: Level of Risk:

Explain how participating in the research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects.

For example:
There is very little risk to participants, and they are being told that they can choose not to participate and can withdraw at any time. The research will involve participants producing drawings with a variety of non-toxic instruments of their choosing. Participants will be asked to draw a flower. The researcher will watch for signs of frustration or distress among participants.”

Prompt 2: Participants Rights:

Describe how the waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects.

For example:
Participants are being told that they can choose not to participate and can withdraw at any time."

Prompt 3: Necessity of Waiver:

Explain why the research could not practically be carried out without the waiver or alteration.

For example:
If participants are made aware that their participation in the flower drawing exercise is part of research, it may alter their artistic expression and provide erroneous data."

Prompt 4: Information to be Provided:

Describe the process in which the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation (for example, a debrief letter), and what that information would entail. If providing additional information would not be appropriate, explain.

For example:
All participants will be provided with a debrief that explains the nature of the study once the session is complete or if they withdraw."

Prompt 5: Identifiable Private Information orBiospecimenss:

Explain why the research could not be practicably carried out without using identifiable private information or biospecimens in an identifiable format.

For example:
“Because the research involves participants' feeling about their names, names must be collected."

"Blood work could indicate evidence of infectious disease; if this occurs, the participant must be contacted."

If your research does not involve identifiable private information or biospecimens, type "n/a" in the prompt.
 

Prompt 6: Multiple Data Collection Processes:

If your research involves more than one period of data collection (e.g., surveys and in-person interviews), indicate which process you are requesting the waiver for.

For example:
“Informed consent will not be provided during the initial survey phase, but will be provided (and forms will be signed) during the interview phase."

Prompt 7: Elements of Informed Consent:

If only a portion of the elements of informed consent/assent are to be waived, list the elements of informed consent/assent for which the waiver is being requested and a justification for each.

For example:
“All elements of informed consent except the purpose for the research will be provided."

Return to Top

SPONSORED RESEARCH

If your research is being funded by an external source, such as a grant, you will need to complete the Application for IRB Review Addendum Sponsored Research. 

Principal Investigator of Contract or Grant:

In some cases, the Principal Investigator (PI) named on the grant or contract may be different from the PI of the study. Indicate the name of the PI in the grant/contract, if it is someone other than the PI named in the study protocol.
 

Funding Source:

Indicate the full name of the agency that is funding the research.
 

Contract or Grant Title:

Indicate the name or title of the grant as it appears on the grant application or contract.
 

Contract or Grant Number:

Indicate the contract or grant number provided by the agency that is funding the project.
 

Prompt I.1: Requirements imposed by funding agencies that are not already covered in this application:

Many funding agencies have requirements that are in addition to those established in 45 CFR 46 or EIU policy. The PI will be responsible for understanding and complying with those requirements. These can include (but are not limited to):
  • Production of public use data files
  • Additional training requirements
  • Personnel qualifications
  • Reporting requirements
  • Parent/Guardian rights and consent procedures
Thoroughly describe additional funding agency requirements and explain the process for ensuring those requirements will be met.
 

Prompt I.2: NIH Sponsored Research:

If your study is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), NIH policy requires that grantees have procedures in place for data safety monitoring of clinical trials. Please provide a description of the data safety monitoring plan for your study.
 

Prompt I.3: Federal Wide Assurance FWAA):

If the research project receives funds from any federal agency (such as NIH), each study site must have a Federal Wide Assurance FWA) with the Office for Human Research Protections OHRP).

Provide the FWA number in this section of the application for any organization that serves as a collaborative partner for this project, and/or for any facility not owned and operated by EIU in which the research will be conducted. Any organization’s FWA may be searched for at the Office for Human Research Protections web site

FWAs are a requirement of OHRP and not EIU’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) or EIU’s Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.

If you are applying for federal funding and require EIU’s FWA, contact the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at 217-581-2125 for this and any other information regarding FWA documentation that is required on the funding agency’s application form.

Return to Top

Related Pages

Contact Information

Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP)

1102 Blair Hall
217-581-2125
eiugrants@eiu.edu


Take the next step

apply now
schedule a visit