| Fall 2024 | Cohort Total | Spring 2025 | Cohort Total | Retention Rate | Fall 2023 | Cohort Total | Spring 2024 | Cohort Total | Retention Rate |
| 202490 | 97 | 202530 | 79 | 81% | 202390 | 97 | 202430 | 82 | 85% |
Mean grade point averages of the graduating class: 3.45
Average years to complete the degree: 4
Availability of awards/scholarships
Tuition expenses to complete the entire program/option:
| Undergraduate 2024-2025 Costs | ||
| Cost Item | Domestic Undergraduates | International Undergraduates |
| Tuition Per Credit Hour | $338.35 | $422.94 |
| Tuition (15 hrs FA and SP) | $10,150.50 | $12,688.20 |
| Fees | $3,506.68 | $3,506.68 |
| Textbook Rental Fee* | $262.50 | $262.50 |
| Food and Housing (Unlimited Meal Plan) | $12,520.00 | $12,520.00 |
| 2024-2025 Cost | $26,439.68 | $28,977.38 |
Career placement rates |
Program | FY 2020 | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 |
| Computer Information Technology | 89% | 90% | 100% | 75% |
| Objective 1: | Analyze a complex computing problem and to apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions. | |||
| Faculty Name: | Toqeer Israr | |||
| Course Number | CIT 2183 | |||
| Course Name | SW Dev I | |||
| Semester | Fall 2024 | |||
| Year | 2024 | |||
| Number of Students | 23 | |||
| Measurement Method | Question on Final Project and on Final Exam | |||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| beginning | satisfactory | Skilled | exemplary | |
| Analyzes problem and identifies solution by applying principles of computing | Incorrect application of computing principles or fails to analyze problem and identify solutions | Limited identification of analysis and/or solutions using computing principles | Reasonable identification of analysis and/or solutions using computing principles | In-depth and comprehensive utilization of computing principles, identification of solution well beyond expectations |
| Student | Question from Final Project | Question from Final Exam | Overall | Overall Percentage |
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 66.67% |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 2.00 | 66.67% |
| 8 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 9 | 3 | 2 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 10 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 15 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 66.67% |
| 18 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 19 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 20 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 21 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00% |
| 22 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| 23 | 2 | 3 | 2.50 | 83.33% |
| Average | 2.61 | 86.96% | ||
| Objective 3: | Communication | ||||
| Performance Indicator | Adapting formal and impromptu presentations, debates, and discussions to their audience and purpose. | ||||
| Faculty Name: | McKenzie Snoddy | ||||
| Course Number | CIT 1813 | ||||
| Course Name | Intro to C++ | ||||
| Semester | Spring 2024 | ||||
| Year | 2024 | ||||
| Number of Students | 33 | ||||
| Measurement Method | Group Semester Final Project - Complete one of the Semester Project Choices as a Group - Presentation | ||||
| Communication | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| Highly Competent | Competent | Minimally Competent | Not Competent | ||
| Content highly specific, | Content adequately | Content minimally | Content not specific, | ||
| credible, relevant, sufficient, | specific, credible, | specific, credible, | credible, relevant, | ||
| interesting; evidence | relevant, sufficient, | relevant, sufficient, | sufficient, | ||
| supported topic; connection | interesting; lacked | interesting; minimal | interesting; ideas not | ||
| between support and main | support for some | support; few | supported; | ||
| points is clear; content was | points; partial audience | information sources | information sources | ||
| appropriate to situation and | adaptation of content; | cited; little audience | not cited; lacks | ||
| audience; information source | some information | adaptation of content. | audience adaptation | ||
| accurately cited. | sources cited. | of content. | |||
| Student | Presentation 1 | Pres 1 Grade | Presentation 2 | Pres 2 Grade | Overall |
| 1 | 200 | 100% | 30 | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | 176 | 88% | 20 | 67% | 77% |
| 3 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 4 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 5 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 6 | 169 | 85% | 15 | 50% | 67% |
| 7 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 8 | 120 | 60% | 10 | 33% | 47% |
| 9 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 10 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 11 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 12 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 13 | 169 | 85% | 15 | 50% | 67% |
| 14 | 169 | 85% | 15 | 50% | 67% |
| 15 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 16 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 17 | 200 | 100% | 30 | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 19 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 20 | 169 | 85% | 15 | 50% | 67% |
| 21 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 22 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 23 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 24 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 25 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 26 | 176 | 88% | 20 | 67% | 77% |
| 27 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 28 | 200 | 100% | 30 | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 30 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 31 | 200 | 100% | 30 | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | 196 | 98% | 25 | 83% | 91% |
| 33 | 169 | 85% | 15 | 50% | 67% |
| Average | 86% | ||||
| Objective 5: | Work Effectively on a Team | |||||||
| Performance Indicator (a) | Contributes to Team to accomplish a given task | |||||||
| Faculty Name: | McKenzie Snoddy | |||||||
| Course Number | CIT 1813 | |||||||
| Course Name | Intro to C++ | |||||||
| Semester | Spring 2024 | |||||||
| Year | 2024 | |||||||
| Number of Students | 33 | |||||||
| Measurement Method | Group Semester Final Project - Complete one of the Semester Project Choices as a Group | |||||||
| Performance Indicator | Exceeds Standards, 4 | Meets Standards, 3 | Partially Meets Standards, 2 | Does Not Meet Standards, 1 | ||||
| Contributes to Team Meetings | Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. | Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. | Offers new suggestions to advance the work of the group. | Shares ideas but does not advance the work of the group. | ||||
| Student | Team Contribution 1 | Team Cont 1 Grade | Team Contribution 2 | Team Cont 2 Grade | Overall | Team Cont 1 | Team Cont 2 | |
| 1 | 200 | 100% | 10 | 100% | 100% | 200 | 10 | |
| 2 | 176 | 88% | 8 | 80% | 84% | |||
| 3 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 4 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 5 | 196 | 98% | 7 | 70% | 84% | |||
| 6 | 169 | 85% | 10 | 100% | 92% | |||
| 7 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 8 | 120 | 60% | 10 | 100% | 80% | |||
| 9 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 10 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 11 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 12 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 13 | 169 | 85% | 10 | 100% | 92% | |||
| 14 | 169 | 85% | 10 | 100% | 92% | |||
| 15 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 16 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 17 | 200 | 100% | 10 | 100% | 100% | |||
| 18 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 19 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 20 | 169 | 85% | 10 | 100% | 92% | |||
| 21 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 22 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 23 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 24 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 25 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 26 | 176 | 88% | 7 | 70% | 79% | |||
| 27 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 28 | 200 | 100% | 10 | 100% | 100% | |||
| 29 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 30 | 196 | 98% | 10 | 100% | 99% | |||
| 31 | 200 | 100% | 10 | 100% | 100% | |||
| 32 | 196 | 98% | 8 | 80% | 89% | |||
| 33 | 169 | 85% | 10 | 100% | 92% | |||
School of Technology
Eastern Illinois University
4513 Lumpkin Hall,
600 Lincoln Avenue
Charleston, Illinois 61920
(217) 581-2721
taisrar@eiu.edu